Concerning the Review
ACER’s Report regarding the Review
Queensland national’s draft reaction to the Review
Are accountable to federal government
ACER’s interim report had been provided into the state Minister for Education, Training and Employment in May 2014, a draft associated with report uploaded towards the ACER web site in September 2014, together with report that is final into the Minister in October 2014. You will find 23 guidelines: seven on tertiary entry, eleven on senior evaluation and reporting, and five on execution.
Government response
In January 2015, the Queensland Government circulated its draft a reaction to the review report. The draft reaction supplied support that is in-principle a quantity of key proposals outlined into the review such as the retirement associated with the current OP system. The draft federal government response ended up being put through consultation that is further key training stakeholders while the wider Queensland community. Consultation continued through to the final end of March 2015 via an internet survey and written submissions. The outcomes of consultation will notify the growth of A queensland that is final government for launch in mid-2015. There was clearly state election at the conclusion of January 2015, which led to an alteration of government.
Viewpoint regarding the reviewers
That the system’s weaknesses have already been identified imply that modification is necessary and important. The character associated with the weaknesses additionally the undeniable fact that those weaknesses are now actually when you look at the general public domain ensures that modification can’t be delayed.
National statement of the latest system
Faqs
We quite often hear questions regarding the suggestions associated with the review or top features of system in line with the guidelines associated with review. Responses for some of the concerns is supposed to be published to the web web site. The responses may be chatty maybe not formal. Please be aware that government choices in regards to the recommendations that are report’s are making a few of the concerns and answers redundant.
ACER post-Review writings
Masters, G.N. & Issues, G.N. (2014, November). “a deal that is new end-of-school assessment”, Education Review. Academic Media.
Issues, G.N., 2015. ” Translating learning that is rich into certified outcomes and university selection products”. Paper introduced at ACER 2015 analysis Conference, Learning assessments: Designing the future, Melbourne, 16–18 August 2015.
ACER many many thanks contributors to your Review
ACER want to thank key stakeholders, interested events and also the wider community with their engagement, insights and share for this Review. Both by request and on invitation at the completion of the primary consultation phase through to June 2014, we have received more than 2200 responses to the survey, nearly 100 formal submissions, conducted 4 significant stakeholder forums (involving almost 300 key stakeholders and interested parties), and participated in approximately 50 meetings with key stakeholders and their constituents and/or committees. We now have also made presentations that are numerous seminars and attended other key discussion boards around Queensland to get input and talk about the progress and instructions associated with the Review.
The insights and contribution of most are greatly valued and so are indispensable in informing the Queensland report on Senior Assessment and Tertiary Entrance.
Regards to reference
The Terms of Reference for the review are vast plus some of this problems are universal. ACER’s approach would be to check out the long term, in addition to findings associated with the review shall no doubt have relevance beyond Queensland.
Shut consultation meeting – 18 2014 june
ACER Joint Investigators Geoff Masters and Gabrielle Matters came across utilizing the CEOs (or equivalent/delegates) over the Queensland education sector, such as the Director-General of the Department of Education ,Training and Employment, the 3 education sectors, universities as well as other providers, QSA, QTAC, parent teams, major associations and instructor union representatives to go over the recommendations that are proposed. This conference offered a way to further explain, determine help and outstanding aspects for further consideration when you look at the stage that is final of Review.
Records
Appearing guidelines and Details: Presentation by Dr Gabrielle Matters and Professor Geoff Masters + Q&A session 29 April 2014
This significant event offered an opportunity for key stakeholders and interested events to listen to the direction and information on proposals for senior evaluation and tertiary entrance in Queensland and indulge in a Q & A session utilizing the ACER Reviewers, Dr Gabrielle issues and Prof Geoff Masters.
A duplicate for the presentation out of this event can be obtained. Disclaimer: take note, the presentation describes the important points and guidelines of ACER’s deliberations during this period associated with Review when it comes to purposes of stakeholder consultation and it is subject to alter while the Review advances. The knowledge supplied doesn’t express ACER or national policy.
The assessment procedure
Key stakeholder organisations will be the main market for ACER’s assessment plan. Other parties that are interested access these details and tend to be encouraged to play a role in present conversations about senior evaluation and tertiary entrance in Queensland.
Review report
ACER’s Report regarding the summary of Senior Assessment and Tertiary Entrance should be sent to any office associated with Minister for Education, Training and Employment on or around 19 September, which is later than scheduled because of reviewers’ intervening circumstances that are personal
Calendar of activities 2014
The time February 2014 to June 2014 will pay attention to the engagement facet of the assessment process.
Summary associated with the review Report brought to the Minister
31 July 19 September
Focus concerns
ACER’s deliberations up to now (as at March 13.3.14) have already been expressed as a couple of eight focus concerns. www.datingrating.net/ukrainedate-review These concerns relate solely to assessment that is school-based outside assessment; moderation; finer scale for college assessments; separation of obligations at the secondary−tertiary user interface; scaling and also the construction of ranking purchases; and governance. Each of these questions is with in three parts: first, a statement associated with reviewers’ suggestion; 2nd, a question that is general prompt a solution; and, third, a particular concern linked to the recommendation doing his thing.
These questions have actually three purposes:
- To summarise ACER’s position that is interim a subset associated with the TORs;
- To create the cornerstone of conversation with key stakeholder organisations as well as other interested events; and,
- To deliver a framework that could be helpful for written submissions into the review.
Written submissions
The deadline for submissions had been 24 April 2014. Submissions are increasingly being evaluated. Peak bodies while the broader community had been invited to answer the collection of focus questions through written submissions.
Review progress
These pages shall be updated with information and documents occasionally while the Review advances. More information relating to this task like the Terms of guide, consultation process, research and history papers, and news coverage could be accessed through the links regarding the remaining hand part with this website or click the links below.
